In his
Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland From Being a
Burden on Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to
the Publick (1729) Jonathan Swift satirically proposed a solution to poverty and the population problem. Infant cannibalism.
There is a grotesque logic to his monstrous calculations:
I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in
London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a
most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted,
baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a
fricasie, or a ragoust.
I do therefore humbly offer it to publick consideration, that of the
hundred and twenty thousand children, already computed, twenty thousand
may be reserved for breed, whereof only one fourth part to be males;
which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle, or swine, and my
reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a
circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore, one male will
be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand
may, at a year old, be offered in sale to the persons of quality and
fortune, through the kingdom, always advising the mother to let them
suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump, and fat
for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for
friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will
make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will
be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.
I have reckoned upon a medium, that a child just born will weigh 12
pounds, and in a solar year, if tolerably nursed, encreaseth to 28
pounds.
I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and therefore very proper for
landlords, who, as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem
to have the best title to the children.
Infant's flesh will be in season throughout the year, but more plentiful
in March, and a little before and after; for we are told by a grave
author, an eminent French physician, that fish being a prolifick dyet,
there are more children born in Roman Catholick countries about nine
months after Lent, the markets will be more glutted than usual, because
the number of Popish infants, is at least three to one in this kingdom,
and therefore it will have one other collateral advantage, by lessening
the number of Papists among us.
I have already computed the charge of nursing a beggar's child (in which
list I reckon all cottagers, labourers, and four-fifths of the farmers)
to be about two shillings per annum, rags included; and I believe no
gentleman would repine to give ten shillings for the carcass of a good
fat child, which, as I have said, will make four dishes of excellent
nutritive meat, when he hath only some particular friend, or his
own family to dine with him. Thus the squire will learn to be a good
landlord, and grow popular among his tenants, the mother will have eight
shillings neat profit, and be fit for work till she produces another
child.
Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the times require) may
flea the carcass; the skin of which, artificially dressed, will make
admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen.
As to our City of Dublin, shambles may be appointed for this purpose, in
the most convenient parts of it, and butchers we may be assured will not
be wanting; although I rather recommend buying the children alive, and
dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs.
Also recommended:
Cannibalistic
Capitalism and other American Delicacies: A Bataillean Taste of The Texas
Chain Saw Massacre.
By Naomi Merritt
Read the full article
here.
Abstract.
The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (Tobe Hooper, 1974) presents a
nightmarish vision of an America,
metaphorically and literally devouring itself.
‘Home, sweet, home’ becomes the slaughterhouse and consumers become the
consumed as ‘cannibalistic capitalism’ (embodied by a family of unemployed but
murderous abattoir workers), wreaks havoc on the lives of a hedonistic group of
youths, as the ‘Age of Aquarius’ comes to a bloody end. Chain Saw offers a model of horror that is
both deeply rooted in American ideology, taboos, and the key (and
interdependent) institutions of the family, the worker and capitalism, yet
produces aberrant and transgressive versions of these same social units. In this paper, the film’s representation of
‘cannibalistic capitalism’ will be explored in relation to Georges Bataille’s
theory of taboo and transgression. While
Bataille asserts that the ‘main function of all taboos is to combat violence’
(thus maintaining the power, integrity and conformity of social institutions),
he also suggests that the taboo paradoxically begets its own violent
transgression. In The Texas Chain Saw
Massacre, capitalism’s transgressive excesses both ignite the taboo’s
prohibitive power while revelling in and glorifying its violation. This paper offers a ‘taste’ of a Bataillean
approach to the theorising of horror and the spectatorial ‘pleasures’ of
submitting to the anguish it provokes.